Far East Economic Review 15 Jan.1988
Far
East Economic Review 15
Jan.1988
HONGKONG
No
place to hide
China's
jailing of territory's resident raises human - rights questions
By
Emily Lau in Hongkong
Sensitivity
among residents here to human - rights issues has been heightened by renewed
attempts by local groups to secure the release of a Hongkong - born Chinese
imprisoned in China for engaging in " counter - revolutionary activities
and by a visit by two members of the British Parliament's human - rights group.
In
December, a number of religious and labour groups petitioned Hong Kong Governor
Sir David Wilson to request the early release of Liu Shanqing , a 35 - year -
old computer sales engineer who is serving a 10 - year sentence in Canton for
" collaborating with other counter - revolutionary elements to attack the
socialist system and the people's democratic dictatorship and to violate the
laws and regulations of China ."
Some
members of the so - called Committee for the Rescue of Liu Shan qing held a
three-day sit-in outside the Hongkong branch of China's official Xinhua news
agency, Peking's chief representative body in the territory.
A
Roman Catholic priest, Fr Franco Mella , staged a week - long hunger strike in
protest against Liu's imprisonment . Liu has been adopted as a prisoner of
conscience by Amnesty International, the London - based human - rights group.
Liu, a
graduate of Hongkong University, was arrested in December 1981 while visiting
the families of jailed Chinese democracy - movement activists Wang Xizhe and He
Qiu . He was sentenced in 1983. Liu has repeatedly refused Chinese attempts to
get him to plead guilty to the charges laid against him. His father, 63 and in
poor health, last visited Liu in October 1987 , when he discovered his son had
been put in solitary confinement to study Marxism Leninism . Liu has
periodically suffered this form of punishment.
Liu
was by no means a leader in Hongkong's own democracy movement, and the harsh
punishment given him is seen only as a deterrent to others who would meddle in
mainland politics. The Chinese Government regards all Hongkong Chinese "
compatriots " as Chinese nationals - even those who hold the so - called
British dependent territories citizens passports, which are issued by the
Hongkong Government but are unacceptable to Chinese authorities for travel to
China by ethnic Chinese. Hongkong Chinese travel to China on " home -
visit permits " issued by mainland authorities.
Questions
about Liu's detention have been raised in the British Parliament. The
government's response has been that all Hongkong Chinese have limited British
and Chinese nationality and that since this is the case, the British Government
could not offer protection to someone arrested by Chinese authorities.
Some
of Liu's supporters accept that the British Government cannot intervene in
Liu's case because , they say it is a Chinese matter . But they view Liu's
arrest and detention as a human rights issue and have criticized local
democrats for not speaking out on Liu's behalf . They accuse these people of
focusing narrowly on the interests of Hongkong and failing to look at
developments in their wider context.
Many
local democrats believe the fight for democracy in Hongkong is inevitably
linked to the democracy movement in China. However, they say they have
refrained from speaking out on the Liu case because they do not want to be
accused by Peking of meddling in what China considers its internal affairs.
But
the local democrats agree that without democracy in China, Hongkong, as a
future special administrative region (SAR) of China, will not enjoy the high
degree of autonomy promised in the 1984 Sino - British Joint Declaration on
Hongkong's future. In the declaration, Britain and China agreed that Hongkong
would be returned to Chinese sovereignty in 1997.
The
renewed attempts to secure Liu's release have generated nervousness among some
in Hongkong's pro - democracy movement who fear that one day Peking may regard
their activities as " counter- revolutionary. " The Chinese criminal
code stipulates that all Chinese nationals, including those residing outside
China, are subject to Chinese jurisdiction and so can be charged for engaging
in counter - revolutionary activities.
There
are no reliable statistics on how many Hongkong Chinese have been jailed in
China, but a Hongkong Government official said about 20 such cases have come to
the government's attention. Most, she said, involve commercial offences, but a
few are of a political nature. The detainees ' families are reluctant to speak
in behalf of relatives for fear of antagonizing Chinese authorities. The Liu
case has demonstrated the vulnerability of Hongkong Chinese to arrest and
detention in China.
The
joint declaration stipulates that " provisions of the International Coven
ant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as applied to Hongkong shall remain in
force” after 1997 .
However,
China is not a signatory to these covenants, and if it does not become one by
1997, it will have no obligation, other than that stated in the joint
declaration, to implement the provisions in the Hongkong SAR. A Hongkong
Government source said the protection offered in the joint declaration was
meant only to apply to Hongkong people residing in Hongkong and could not
protect Hongkong people when they are in China .
But
whether the joint declaration really will provide protection to Hongkong residents
in post - 1997 Hongkong is in doubt . Nihal Jayawickrama , a Hongkong
University law lecturer , said that since Britain has never ratified an
optional protocol to the ICCPR , residents here have no right to petition the
UN Human Rights Committee on alleged infringements of the covenant .
The
two MPs from the British parliament's human - rights group , Clive Soley and
Robert Hughes , recently conducted a fact - finding visit to Hongkong which
concluded that the statements on human - rights contained in the Sino British
joint declaration should be built into the Basic Law . The Basic Law, being
drawn up by Peking, will serve as a mini - constitution for the Hongkong SAR.
The MPs also argued that the international human - rights covenants should be
made subject to jurisdiction in Hongkong's courts. To do so, the MPs said, they
must be incorporated into local law.
留言
發佈留言