八個宗教團體請願
甘神父在九月份組織了八個團體上書,我的資料夾有一份應是他手改的英文稿件,沒有日期。
(第一頁,第二頁)
REQUEST FOR THE RELEASE OF
MR. LIU SAN QING
Hong Kong resident Mr. Liu
San Qing, now 31 years old, graduated from Science Faculty of the University of
Hong Kong. Originally a computer sales engineer, was arrested by the Chinese
Security Office when touring to Guangzhow on December 25, 1981.
At first, the Security
Office refused to disclose the reasons for his arrest, until later it was known
that Mr. Liu was arrested under criminal law article 102 for
counter-revolutionary activities, sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment and
deprived of 3 years' political freedom.
The event caused great
sensation in Hong Kong and abroad, and it
was generally acknowledged that he was arrested without adequate (giver
evidence and with excessive sentence. Recently, eight Hong Kong organisations
have endorsed a letter and endorse to the People's Court of Canton, to China
News Agent, and to Mr. Ji Peng Fei, the head of the Hong Kong and Macau Affair
Office. To date, no reply has been received.
For the last 3 years, Mr.
Liu was allowed communication with his family in Hong Kong once every 3 months.
The letters were normally short and Mr. Liu mentioned that everything was fine
in prison. According to Mr. Liu's father who paid him a visit to the prison in
rural Guangzhou a few months ago, it is believed that Mr. Liu is still
imprisoned there.
As a member of the Hong
Kong Society, we hope to express our opinions of the case:
1. Not a serious case, yet
excessive penalty
It is understood that Mr.
Liu only expressed his genuine concern for the future of the democratization of
the People's Republic of China and was concerned about the family of the
political prisoners. It is a bit too much to sentence him to 10 years' imprisonment
and deprive him of 3 years' political rights.
2. Changing society, not
counter-revolutionary
In fact, Mr. Liu was a
social activist who had joined the work of teaching in a laborer’s night
school, supported the Jubilee Secondary School teachers and students struggling
for return to original school, supported the Yaumati boat people pleading for
moving on land. All this evidence was seem to us quite adequate to justify our
conviction that Mr. Liu had been striving for the betterment of society. It is,
therefore, totally out of character that he should have committed any
counter-revolutionary crimes. 3.
Requesting for amnesty after 3 years' imprisonment
Up to the present, Mr. Liu
has been deprived of 3 years' freedom. Even if he had committed a small crime,
he should have been released now. Beyond the criminal laws itself, article 102
is equivocal. We request that the Chinese Government grant an amnesty to Mr.
Liu as soon as possible, so that he can reunite with his family and continue
his meaningful social commitment.
留言
發佈留言